Today, we will conduct a simulation game experiment. The main character is a King George V-class battleship from the World War II era. After removing all the old WWII weapons and leaving only the skeleton, can it defeat a modern warship? Which is stronger, a modern warship or a WWII warship? Today, we will analyze this in detail to see the specific practical advantages.

After removing the WWII weapons from this battleship, it was equipped with advanced dual electromagnetic railguns, maximizing firepower. For anti-ship capabilities, Bazalt anti-ship missiles could be chosen, with two on each side. Behind the skeleton and on both sides of the main guns, YJ-21 anti-ship missiles could also be added. Of course, air defense cannot be ignored, and some autocannons or Mauser automatic cannons could be selected.

In the actual combat phase, three modern aircraft carriers could be chosen, for example, the Zumwalt-class destroyer. At the start of the battle, the air defense system should be activated immediately, followed by opening all the autocannon fire, successfully intercepting most of the missiles. Then, once the electromagnetic railgun is charged, it can directly hit the enemy's destroyer and even penetrate the armor.

When facing the second ship, the main gun can continue to show its power, instantly reducing the opponent's health by half. Subsequently, modern anti-ship missiles are launched; although they hit the target, they did not penetrate the armor. Finally, there is an old WWII companion, but this time, it is the modified version of the warship. After locking onto the radar, the missile is launched, and the opposing air defense has no way to intercept it.

Which is stronger, a modern warship or a WWII warship? After the above comparison, I believe everyone now understands how to operate. As for which weapon is more powerful, you should still experience it yourself to see the specific effects.